Symbology Research
I have always been a bit skeptical of marketing research especially research involving focus groups. Is it really possible for someone to tell you why they like a brand or not and if not, why they don’t? Or are they just telling you what they think you want to hear?
Occasionally I get asked why I like a TV spot or a brand. My first reaction is “I don’t know, I just do” but knowing I need to provide the inquirer with a more intelligent response I dig to come up with an answer. It is probably not really the right or most accurate answer but it is the best I could come up with at the time.
So what if members of a focus group couldn’t think about their answers? What if you could tap right into their brains to get the real response and understand exactly why they make the choices they do? Stuff of science fiction right? Maybe not.
A few weeks back I attended a symbology research study for a client. This type of research is based on the Jungian depth psychology and supposedly taps into the brain’s hardwiring through the use of imagery. Participants are given a deck of cards that have images on them. Every deck has the same images and these images do not change from study to study. The idea is that these images connect on an emotional level with all humans and everybody connects with them in the same way, even six year-olds.
The trouble with regular focus groups is that every response from a participant has been rationalized, like my example above. The symbology research methodology removes that filter and instead taps into the “old brain” through a card sorting process. In every focus group, the participants are taken through 5 different card sorting exercises. The first one is a warm-up exercise and they are asked to sort based on how they feel about their life/job. They are instructed to sort through the cards at a pace similar to dealing a deck of cards. They are not supposed to think just look at the picture and put it into either a “connected with” or “not connected with” pile. Having gone through this myself it is very strange. You literally do not know why you put a card into one pile or the other but if you stop to think about it, then that is when you begin to rationalize. So the moderators watch you to make sure you are sorting fast enough to know that you aren’t thinking about it.
Once the sort is complete you are asked to take the “connected with pile” and pull out the 3-4 cards that you connected with the most. Each card is connected to one of 6 different archetypes: wise old man, mother, father, trickster, child and hero. This is when it starts to get weird as it is uncanny how many of the same cards appear with each participant and across each group when doing a sort to a brand or a TV spot. After two groups, the patterns are so obvious that the moderator has all of the information they need to draw an analysis.
The symbology research I sat in on was testing a brand and then some marketing materials for that brand. The groups were asked to sort based on what they thought of the brand and then did separate sorts against all of the marketing materials. From this we were able to learn what the archetype is for the brand, based on how consumer’s perceive. We also learned what the ideal archetype should be for the brand based on the category they are in. If the archetype for the brand and the ideal were extremely different, then we would know there is an issue and would walk out of the research knowing there was a problem to solve. Same goes for the marketing materials, if they strayed too far from the perceived archetype or ideal archetype then they would be off brand and revisions should be considered.
After reading this you are probably skeptical and to be honest I am still slightly skeptical as well. But having witnessed it for myself, there is something to it as the similarities between participants and groups was just eerie.