This is an old article I wrote. But it’s good for now!
One of the questions people ask me most in this business (just after “Do you really have to charge me for that?” and “Can I see something tomorrow?) is “Can you make a viral component for this?” I always cringe when I hear it. Even now, after all this time, the phrase “viral marketing” seems really cheesy. Hasn’t marketing always been based on word of mouth? Do we have to give it a disease-riddled name just because the medium has changed? My protestations aside, the term has stuck, and for better or worse, we at the Barbarian Group have done a fair amount of it. My coworkers and I always have a pretty good idea, before we even finish, whether it would fly or not. We’ve noticed a few consistent factors, and I’ve boiled them down to 5 handy rules on viral marketing:
Viral Marketing is neither e-cards, nor is it an add-on. All too often potential clients want to cover all the bases with one interactive initiative. They want to build what they think is an robust site, and then simply tack on some e-cards to it, to give it a viral component. Always remember: there has to be a compelling reason for the user to send around a link or a site: The ability for a user to spread the word does not equate with a reason for him/her to bother.
Accept that you may not be able to control your brand completely with good viral marketing. “Branding” has been so dominant in advertising theory for so long now, we often forget that it’s just one theory. A good one, to be sure, but it has its limits. Viral Marketing cannot necessarily be branded. I’ve found it’s best to be 100% up-front about this with your client, from the beginning. The last thing you want to have happen is to develop an amazingly funny, viral video and have the client insist that their logo and tagline end it. Your target market is amazingly media savvy – that’s why you’re trying to get to them with viral marketing and not a print ad, right? – and they will resenting any overt manipulation. In general, viral marketing works because it conveys the sense that a company is about more than money and branding, that it has the same sense of fun and the same worldview as its customers. This worldview is not a corporate, branded one.
Viral Marketing is especially susceptible to too many cooks in the kitchen. In retrospect, this is the single biggest stumbling block for good viral marketing. A great idea is born, and between the great idea and the public finally experiencing it, there are any number of intermediate stages of approval – an agency creative, his/her superior, the client, the client’s boss, the president of the client company and, if you’re uniquely unlucky, there’s a parent company with a whole new batch of stakeholders. When people ask us “why did such-and-such campaign get so successful?”, 9 times out of 10, it’s because no one was paying attention to us. Brand managers were on vacation, or they didn’t care about interactive. When that’s not an option, remember that the ability to massage your work unfettered through these approvals, along with the ability to secretly skip over them, is as important as a good idea when it comes to viral marketing.
Trust your instincts, but do a little market testing. If you don’t think it’s funny, no one else will either. Listen to yourself as you work on the campaign. You’ll know, deep down, if it’s going to work or not. If you have doubts, don’t ignore them. And don’t send something out in the world if you don’t genuinely think it will be effective. That being said, the echo chamber is a real risk. Find some people in the demographic, and pitch the idea to them. If the bulk of them don’t laugh right away, it might be time to head back to the drawing board.
Sometimes, even the best creative needs a little push. It’s easy to get dogmatic about viral marketing and say “if it’s good, it’ll take right off.” But the internet is a big place, and unless you really know how to work it and drive traffic immediately, it can be hard to get people to notice your endeavors. We’ve had campaigns sit on the web for months before they took off, and by then it can be too late. Consider a small banner campaign to kick things off, or, better yet, think about hiring a firm to “seed” the campaign (I know, viral seeding. Ick). A relatively small investment here can mean the difference between a lost investment or a fantastic ROI.
Another insight, from a letter to AdAge I wrote last year:
Mass marketing works consistently, viral marketing fails or works spectacularly. The allure of viral marketing is not that it works better, it’s that it might work much better, for a lot less. The downside, of course, is that viral marketing might not work at all: we, as marketers, don’t “make virals,” we make things that sometimes “go viral.”
It’s probably time that brands start thinking of viral marketing as one component of your marketing: one that might provide massive additional benefits for a small amount of money, but then again, might not. Win some, lose some. But over time, with a consistent, methodical approach to it, the extra cost will pay for itself over a broad spectrum of endeavors. Even the most cautious investor still likes to play a hot stock tip, just not with their 401k.
on October 29, 2008 at 12:08 PM
filed under: Viral Marketing
Really interesting article over at WSJ on the Wassup guys, whom were made infamous from their Budweiser commercials of the late ‘90s. The interesting thing to me, is not that the actors all got together again to make this updated political statement, but rather, that this is a case of a film maker who licensed his idea to a major brand for a set period of time, and now since the licensing deal has been expired for the past 3 years, that film maker is able to feed off of the fame it already produced for him. Its a very smart way to work.
It has me thinking, what if our brands of yester year were always licensed like this? What if Tony the Tiger’s contract was up and then he moved on to promote the green party to help conservation of our natural resources and wildlife? Or imagine the Country Crock couple endorsing their religiously motivated family planning issue? To me, this is opening a whole new space for consumerism to turn into activism. And maybe that is a good thing right now.
on October 22, 2008 at 11:42 PM
filed under: Viral Marketing
Caught this on the way home a few nights ago, I could have sworn I have seen something similar to it somewhere.
I’d like to see where other agencies and clients decide to further push the idea of interactive advertising living in the real world. I enjoy the act of asking the user to engage with the ad itself, something the internet has been doing for years and it’s no surprise that other media markets are beginning to take notice. Another interesting ad buy that I saw last night in Times Square, another one based around the current election, was a large video billboard bought by the Obama campaign where in which you text in a short message to a number, and that message is then broadcasted to the screen. Check out a demo of it here.
on September 25, 2008 at 05:35 PM
filed under: Viral Marketing
An interesting article on the NYT today about how almost all of the billboard and bus shelter ads created by Wieden + Kennedy for ESPN Monday Night Football that were printed on SynLawn (fake grass) had been stolen.
I don’t know…maybe I’d consider this a success? It’s pretty awesome, either way – I’d use one of those big billboard ones as a carpet.
EA Sports, Wieden + Kennedy and Tiger Woods making video responses to YouTube videos as on-line advertising. I like it. Savvy. And, in the case of the Rubik’s Cube ad, slight amazing.
I particularly like that W+K paid Penn State University film student Bryan Levi, who as Levinator25 made and posted the Tiger Woods PGA Tour 08 Jesus Shot, for the rights to his video.
For God’s sake, both my kids are in film schools, why can’t they sell films rights to W+K to help ME defray massive tuition fees. Maybe I’ll have to make a phone call…
UPDATE: So apparently it wasn’t the MTA, but our Media Placement Company who made the call to strike the Hello Health ads. So, deepest of apologies, MTA, for being under the mistaken impression that you were bad guy on this one. Tell you what? I’ll buy an unlimited Metrocard and promptly lose it as penance.
Ok, so who’ll cop to it? Is it for Silent Hill V? Is it for Cloverfield 2? C’mon, ad world, which one of you is trying to pull one over on us this time?
(As an aside, I find it truly depressing that I can’t look at something like this without having a knee-jerk “it’s an ad for something” reaction. See guys? This is why we advise against hoaxism. It just leaves your customers feeling…duped.)